I love doing research but in today's world research is all about following up on the findings of prior research. Creativity is eschewed as if it were false science. Sure, one can be creative within the constraints of this scheme, however there is little place for pure creativity. As such, I doubt there will ever be another Freud or Jung, or even William James for that matter. Of course the advances in statistical science have assured that garbage is sent where it belongs, in the trash can.  Yet many of the most creative and perhaps helpful ideas never see the day of light. Further, and perhaps more important, the more the establishment neglects creativity, the more likely our science is not to reach the people whom need it the most, the practitioners in the field, and the victims of psychological/psychiatric disease. This leaves the people needing help most at the mercy of false psychologists and self-help gurus. The problem is that creativity has a large intuitive component, and intuition does not fit logical reasoning, as intuition is often difficult to make explicit (see Piaget). At any rate, we must find a way to include good intuition (intuition of the experts) in science. Only then will we attain the real results we desire, the elimination of unnecessary psychological disease

There are no comments to this entry.